In reply to:
Power to the People ☭🕊
@ProudSocialist
·
1d
The statement suggests a conspiracy theory about a 'techno-feudal state' being established, which can be considered public discourse as it addresses societal concerns about governance and technology. The reply 'Indeed' indicates agreement with this perspective.
- The statement may cause harm by spreading fear or misinformation about societal governance. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy or dignity of those it accuses of deception without evidence. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, promoting a divisive narrative. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead making broad accusations without evidence. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.