Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 84
2/22/2025, 9:12:15 AM
X
In reply to:
FreeSpeechGirl
@FreeSpeechGirl
·
2d
@marwilliamson @CFHeather You're wrong. But what do you know, you love spending OUR money. When you ran for POTUS you wanted reparations lol. You wanted to take money from one group of taxpayers who've never owned slaves, and give it to another group of taxpayers who have never been slaves.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
2d
@FreeSpeechGirl @CFHeather This will not be money in your pocket. It will be money in theirs.
FreeSpeechGirl
@FreeSpeechGirl
·
2d
@marwilliamson @CFHeather It'll save taxpayers money. Whats with democrats who love spending our money? I'd rather have my money in my pocket thanks.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
2d
@CFHeather If you think the firings they're doing now is going to help you in any way, shape or form, I have a bridge to sell you. On the other hand, while you might not feel you rely on govt, what they're doing is very likely to affect you too.
𝙲𝙵𝙷𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 🇺🇸
@CFHeather
·
2d
@marwilliamson Most of us out here in the real world don’t rely on the Federal Government for safety, health, and well being.” But we have to work 4 months out of every year to pay for the excessively large government we have, or that government will put us in jail.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
2d
Summarily firing people is bad enough.

Gutting agencies that are necessary to people's safety, health and well-being is bad enough.

But firing people who have had stellar performance reviews, telling them that their work was inadequate and below par is just cruel.

It's…

The statement engages in a public discourse about the topic of reparations and government spending, which are significant societal issues. The tone is somewhat confrontational, as it challenges the previous speaker's position on reparations and government spending. The intent appears to be to question the economic impact of reparations and to provoke a response from the other party.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but the confrontational tone could be seen as unproductive.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on challenging the other party. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue but does so in a confrontational manner, which may not be constructive. [-1]