Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47

Score 84

@briebriejoy There's a type of traditional politician who won't just say what they mean, thinking people wouldn't understand their words or something. So they try to *figure out* what to say, which makes them come across as terribly disingenuous, which they are. And the result is then worse…

2/22/2025, 9:27:52 AM

In reply to:

Briahna Joy Gray

@briebriejoy

They're still doing this.

Republicans have whipped the country into a fever pitch re DEI, Critical Race Theory, & "Woke," but libs are still scared to call oligarchs oligarchs.

To the extent folks don't know what this means, might it be because you're afraid to use the word!?

Jemele Hill

@jemelehill

Not trying to be funny, but this isn’t a good title for the tour. A lot of the people you’re trying to reach don’t know what oligarchy means, and certainly not within the context of their everyday life.

The statement critiques politicians for being disingenuous by not clearly communicating their intentions, suggesting this leads to public misunderstanding. It engages in public discourse by addressing political communication and public understanding of political terms.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to highlight a perceived issue in political communication, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for clarity. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding by encouraging politicians to be more straightforward, which could foster better public comprehension. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement criticizes politicians but does not engage in personal attacks, focusing instead on their communication style. [+1]