In reply to:
Meredith Whittaker
@mer__edith
·
330d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
928d
The statement by @mer__edith is a response to a conversation about the implications of certain political actions on privacy and freedom. It engages with public discourse by addressing the broader issue of political consistency and the impact of policies on civil liberties.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a critique of political actions that could harm privacy and freedom.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by advocating for consistent principles that protect these values. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of consistent messaging and principles. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by focusing on principles rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by advocating for principled stances and consistent messaging. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.