Robert Costa

The statement discusses a directive allegedly sent to federal employees, asking them to justify their work, which could be seen as a critique of government efficiency and accountability. This touches on public issues related to governance and public sector performance, thus constituting public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm, but the tone could be perceived as dismissive or undermining the dignity of federal employees. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it could be seen as disrespectful to the privacy and dignity of the employees involved. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it presents a critical view without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks, but it lacks constructive criticism and dialogue, focusing instead on a directive. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no acknowledgment or correction of mistakes in the statement.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement could be seen as using influence to critique government efficiency, but it does not clearly aim for societal betterment.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech but could be more responsible and constructive in its approach.