Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
+4
The statement references a conversation about a public issue, specifically the impact of presidential rhetoric on international freedom movements. It highlights a comparison between Ronald Reagan's and Donald Trump's rhetoric concerning Russia's freedom fighters, suggesting a betrayal by Trump. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with historical and current political issues.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it does critique Trump's rhetoric, which could be seen as harmful to Russia's freedom fighters.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of presidential rhetoric in supporting international freedom movements. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Trump's rhetoric without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on the impact of his words. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing the influence of presidential rhetoric on freedom movements, the statement uses its platform to potentially influence public opinion for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing public figures and their impact on global issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.