In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the state of freedom and civil liberties in Great Britain, referencing protests and media criticism as indicators of a free society. It contrasts with the previous message that criticizes the UK government's stance on encryption and privacy.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies a positive view of Britain's freedom, contrasting with the previous negative view. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks, unlike the previous message. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- Promotes understanding by highlighting aspects of freedom in Britain, offering a counter-narrative to the previous message. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Engages in constructive dialogue by providing a different perspective without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.