The statement refers to a public issue involving a union president's response to an email demand, which is relevant to public discourse. It addresses workplace communication policies and employee rights.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm, as it reports on a clarification regarding email responses. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on policy rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying that email responses are voluntary. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive dialogue by addressing potential confusion over the email demand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.