In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
327d
Anna Paulina Luna
@realannapaulina
·
327d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about potential insider threats and evidence destruction within government agencies. It calls for vigilance against abuses of power, implying a need for transparency and accountability.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by advocating for the protection of evidence, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by not naming specific individuals as threats, but it does imply wrongdoing by unnamed insiders, which could be seen as accusatory. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes vigilance and accountability, which can foster understanding and transparency. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in a form of constructive criticism by urging public figures to be alert, but it could be seen as accusatory without concrete evidence.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.