Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -120

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about judicial actions in Brazil and their potential impact on democracy and electoral politics. It implies a critique of the Brazilian judicial system and suggests international awareness and intervention.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about potential harm caused by judicial actions, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but could be seen as accusatory towards specific individuals, which may not fully respect dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness of international political issues, aligning with this principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in criticism of judicial actions but could be seen as lacking constructive dialogue, potentially violating this principle. [-1]