Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -120
2/25/2025, 3:30:55 AM
X
In reply to:
Levi Leatherberry
@Levi_LCL
·
328d
@shellenberger Dont we just need the president to declassify them.

In his role he can declassify anything at a whim.

Which was the republican argument during the Maralago document FBI fiasco.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
We need the full weight of the federal government to make disclosure happen.

It's been 50 years since the Church Commitee. We need another one.
Mike Lee
@BasedMikeLee
·
328d
This information — about Epstein, the Las Vegas shooter, the JFK assassination, etc. — belongs to the American people

It’s about damn time they be given access to it!
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
Come on let's do this! 🔥🔥🔥
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
@RepLuna
·
328d
On Feb 11 & Feb 19, house oversight sent a letter to the DOJ asking for status on releasing the Epstein files as well as JFK etc.

The DOJ has not responded.

Reaching out on X because we can’t seem to get a response from the AG.

@AGPamBondi what is the status of the…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
LFG Disclosure!!!
Rep. Mike Collins
@RepMikeCollins
·
328d
Release the Epstein files.

Release the Las Vegas shooter files.

Release the JFK files.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
FBI whistleblower @GOBactual confirmed to me that a source inside FBI said FBI employees were destroying evidence on servers, and that he informed @Kash_Patel

I hope he & @AGPamBondi @JohnRatcliffe @elonmusk @realannapaulina are preventing this.

We urgently need disclosure!
Anna Paulina Luna
@realannapaulina
·
328d
There is a massive war happening in the intelligence agencies right now. The corruption being exposed right now is actual treason…

The statement 'Yes' by @Levi_LCL is a brief affirmation in a conversation about the declassification of government documents. The broader conversation involves public discourse on government transparency and accountability, particularly regarding the release of sensitive information. The statement itself is minimal and does not provide substantive engagement with the issues discussed.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm as it is a simple affirmation.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not engage in any form of harassment or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion due to its brevity.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it involve personal attacks.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not involve any mistakes to acknowledge or correct.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not use influence for societal betterment due to its lack of substantive content.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but does not utilize the platform for responsible discourse.