Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a public figure, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and addresses a public issue concerning the qualifications of a nominee for a significant military position. It touches on concerns about the administration's decision-making and the implications for military leadership, which are relevant to public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but raises concerns about the qualifications of a nominee, which is a legitimate public interest issue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not engage in personal attacks or reveal private information.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on a refusal to address concerns.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it mentions a refusal to address the issue, which could be seen as avoiding engagement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement indirectly uses influence by highlighting a public concern, but it does not actively work towards the betterment of society.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing a public issue, but the refusal to address concerns may not fully utilize the platform responsibly. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.