Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
The statement discusses educational reform in Ohio, focusing on merit-based pay for educators and improving school competition. It criticizes past decisions related to school closures and emphasizes educational excellence.
- The statement uses strong language against past decisions, which may not promote understanding or empathy. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The intent to improve education aligns with promoting societal betterment, but the tone could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes past actions without engaging in constructive dialogue, potentially leading to divisiveness. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.