Michael Schellenberger

Rank 42 of 47
|
Score -109

The statement questions the actions of the Trump administration regarding federal employees, suggesting a critique of government oversight or surveillance. It implies a concern for privacy and potential overreach.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about potential harm through government overreach, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy by questioning the administration's actions, suggesting a defense of employee privacy. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but critiques a policy, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]