Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue, specifically the implications of a proposed budget on healthcare and food aid. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived negative consequences of the budget proposal.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but criticizes a policy proposal, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on policy critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding of the potential impacts of the budget, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of a policy rather than personal attacks, aligning with constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to highlight societal issues, aligning with using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly critiquing a public policy. [+1]