Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -109

The statement suggests a serious critique of USAID, implying misconduct or hidden issues. It aims to provoke interest and urgency by using strong language and a call to action ('MUST WATCH').

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm if the claims are unfounded. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect privacy or dignity if the accusations are not substantiated, potentially leading to reputational harm. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on exposing 'dark secrets' without context. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It lacks constructive dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without engaging in a balanced discussion. [-1]