In reply to:
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the role of the judiciary in the democratic process, responding to a critique of judicial decisions as undemocratic. It defends the constitutional principle of judicial independence and checks and balances.
- The statement does not use harmful language but is assertive in defending the judiciary. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by focusing on the issue rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in dialogue by countering a viewpoint but could be seen as confrontational rather than constructive. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by participating in a public debate about democratic principles. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.