Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -109

The statement is a political declaration addressing the issue of foreign interference in American free speech, specifically targeting foreign officials who censor Americans. It is assertive and nationalistic in tone, aiming to protect free speech rights by proposing legislative action.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but its aggressive tone could be seen as confrontational.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does target a specific group (foreign officials) in a broad manner.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on punitive measures rather than dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a unilateral action without inviting discussion or debate. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to propose a legislative action aimed at protecting free speech, which can be seen as a positive use of influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech by advocating against censorship, but the aggressive tone may not fully align with responsible and integrity-driven discourse. [+1]