Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement reports on a public figure, Paul Ingrassia, and his involvement in promoting controversial ideas such as secession and martial law following the 2020 election. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses significant public concerns about election integrity, democratic processes, and the actions of government officials.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but it reports on actions that could potentially harm democratic processes.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on public actions of a public figure, not engaging in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it reports on divisive rhetoric. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but reports on the actions and statements of a public figure, which is a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By reporting on these actions, the statement uses its influence to inform the public about significant issues, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly reporting on public interest issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.