Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement addresses the issue of 'pooling' in journalism, which is a process where a small group of reporters is selected to cover an event and share the information with other media outlets. The statement critiques the government's selection process for excluding major news organizations, suggesting a concern for transparency and accountability in media coverage. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of media access and transparency in government reporting.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a procedural critique, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By highlighting the exclusion of major news organizations, the statement promotes understanding of the importance of diverse media representation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques the government's selection process without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for better media practices, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing government actions and advocating for media transparency. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.