Marianne Williamson

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 68
2/26/2025, 5:27:40 PM
X
In reply to:
Tina Olhava
@tshow78
·
144d
@marwilliamson They were the entire time. 🤦‍♀️🤷‍♀️ Where have you been? This is nothing new. Smh.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
144d
Okay guys, this is what it looks like.

From now on the oligarchs plan to completely run the show.
Jeff Bezos
@JeffBezos
·
144d
I shared this note with the Washington Post team this morning:

I’m writing to let you know about a change coming to our opinion pages.

We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets. We’ll cover other topics too…

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the influence of wealthy individuals on media outlets, a significant societal issue. The tone is sarcastic, suggesting skepticism about the novelty of a billionaire influencing media content.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of a billionaire's influence on media, which could be seen as a critique of power dynamics.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize a public figure's actions.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on sarcasm and critique. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses sarcasm rather than reasoned argument. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on a public issue, but the sarcastic tone may not fully align with responsible use of the platform.