Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement reports on a decision by a public official to change the terminology used for a geopolitical region, which is a substantive engagement with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue. The tone is informative, and the intent is to inform the public about a policy change within a government committee.
- The statement itself does not use harmful language, but the policy it reports on could have implications for how different groups perceive the region, potentially leading to harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is neutral and does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does provide information that could lead to informed discussions.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on reporting a factual change in policy. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By reporting on a policy change, the statement uses its influence to inform the public, which can contribute to societal betterment through informed discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly reporting on a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.