In reply to:
House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@JudiciaryGOP
·
328d
The statement is a supportive reply to a legislative update about the No Censors on Our Shores Act, which addresses the issue of foreign officials violating Americans' First Amendment rights. This engagement with a legislative matter constitutes public discourse as it relates to public policy and civic dialogue.
- The statement does not cause harm with words or actions, as it simply expresses approval of a legislative action.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is purely supportive and does not address any disagreement.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to support a legislative action that the speaker believes is for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by supporting legislation aimed at protecting First Amendment rights. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.