The statement engages in public discourse by addressing transparency and potential government influence on public platforms like Wikipedia and Twitter. It calls for the release of information regarding government interactions, which is a substantive public issue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a need for transparency, which can be seen as a positive action. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech, though it does call for the release of potentially sensitive information.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and transparency by advocating for the release of information that could clarify government influence. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a public figure's request for information without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for transparency, which can be seen as a betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a public discussion about transparency and government influence. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.