The statement criticizes Wikipedia's sourcing rules and accuses it of favoring corporate news outlets over independent media. It suggests that Wikipedia is not a victim in this context, implying a need for transparency and accountability. The tone is critical and challenges Wikipedia's practices, engaging in a broader discussion about media bias and transparency.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses strong language to criticize Wikipedia's practices.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize an organization.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is primarily critical. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for transparency and accountability, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to raise concerns about media practices. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.