In reply to:
Miranda Devine
@mirandadevine
·
329d
The statement by @mirandadevine and the subsequent reply engage in a discussion about media practices and the handling of sensitive information, which are public issues related to media ethics and privacy. The tone is critical of perceived double standards in media and social media platforms' policies.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of media practices, which could be seen as holding them accountable.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not disclosing any new private information but criticizes the handling of previously disclosed information.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of media practices but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by critiquing media practices and social media policies, using the platform to discuss perceived inconsistencies. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.