The statement questions the withholding of certain historical files, suggesting transparency by releasing them. It challenges the justification of protecting the integrity of investigations, especially when key figures are deceased.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly harm but questions governmental transparency, which can be seen as promoting accountability.
[+1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.It respects privacy by focusing on deceased individuals and public figures, not engaging in harassment or hate speech.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive criticism of government actions, avoiding personal attacks.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.It uses influence to advocate for transparency and accountability, aiming for societal betterment.
[+1]