Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement reports on a change in position by a public figure, Donald Trump, regarding his view of another public figure, Zelenskiy. It involves public discourse as it addresses international relations and political dynamics.
- The statement itself does not use harmful language, but it reports on a potentially harmful past statement by Trump, which he seems to be retracting.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does indicate a willingness to work together, which could be seen as a step towards understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it reports on a change in stance, which could be seen as part of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- Trump's response 'did I say that?' suggests a reluctance to acknowledge a past mistake, which does not fully align with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement reflects a potential positive use of influence if the change in tone leads to better diplomatic relations. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and reports on a public figure's stance responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.