Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@JudiciaryGOP
·
307d
The statement refers to a deceptive practice of using a misleading link to a 'rickroll' instead of actual Epstein files, which is a serious topic involving allegations of trafficking. The tone is informal and uses strong language, indicating frustration or disbelief. The intent seems to be to highlight the misleading nature of the link shared by the JudiciaryGOP account.
- The statement uses strong language but does not directly cause harm. However, it highlights a potentially harmful act of misleading the public on a serious issue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does touch on a sensitive topic involving privacy and dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on the deceptive act rather than fostering a constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it does not address the issue with the original poster directly or offer a solution. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement highlights a misuse of a platform by pointing out the misleading link, but it does not use its own platform to responsibly address the issue. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.