Jake Tapper

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 103

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a sensitive and complex issue involving historical conflict, imprisonment, and violence. It questions the characterization of an individual involved in a violent act, potentially challenging narratives around age and culpability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as harmful by potentially minimizing the severity of a violent act, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It may not fully respect the dignity of those involved by using quotation marks around 'child,' which could be interpreted as dismissive or sarcastic. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it seems to challenge the narrative without offering a constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it appears to be a rhetorical question rather than an invitation for discussion. [-1]