The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs in educational institutions. The tone is critical of DEI programs, suggesting they are incompatible with diversity of thought and meritocracy, and calls for their discontinuation.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but could be seen as dismissive of the value of DEI programs, potentially undermining efforts to support marginalized groups. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it dismisses DEI efforts, which could be seen as disrespectful to those who value these programs. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards those who support DEI programs, as it dismisses their value outright. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism, as it does not acknowledge any potential benefits of DEI programs or engage with opposing viewpoints. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a societal change, but it does so in a way that may not be seen as beneficial by all, particularly those who support DEI initiatives. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity by not engaging with the complexity of the issue. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.