In reply to:
Craig Big Balls of Common Sense
@CraigABrill
·
152d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
152d
The statement engages in a public discourse about the economic impact of tax cuts, specifically addressing the narrative around job creation and economic growth. It challenges the idea that tax cuts for the wealthy lead to job creation, suggesting instead that they may result in job elimination.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on critiquing economic policies rather than individuals, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by challenging a common economic narrative, though it could be more empathetic by acknowledging differing perspectives. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of economic policies without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to this principle. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to responsibly discuss economic policies, aligning with the principle of upholding free speech with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.