In reply to:
Carl TheTruth Is Back
@SuckMyTweet17
·
153d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
153d
The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with the topic of civic activism and democracy, responding to a conversation about protecting democracy and addressing perceived authoritarianism.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the use of strong language like 'bullshit' could be seen as aggressive, potentially escalating tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement supports the idea of peaceful actions and civic engagement, promoting understanding and activism against authoritarianism. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a dialogue by countering an accusation of insurrection, but it uses dismissive language ('call bullshit') which could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by defending the right to peaceful protest and civic engagement, but the language could be more responsible and respectful. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.