The statement critiques a specific aspect of Senate Resolution 7 related to women's healthcare, highlighting a perceived issue with the inclusion of men's needs in the context of women's healthcare. The tone is incredulous and critical, suggesting disagreement with the resolution's wording.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses disagreement with the resolution's wording.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on critiquing the resolution without offering constructive alternatives. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or solutions, nor does it engage in personal attacks. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.