Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -109
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d

The statement criticizes California Democrats, attributing their alleged incompetence to ideological beliefs that lead to defunding essential services like police and firefighting. It implies a connection between historical views and current policy decisions, suggesting these beliefs result in inadequate disaster preparedness.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as harmful by attributing motives to a group without evidence, potentially spreading misinformation. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of others by making broad generalizations about a political group. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on blame rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in ad hominem attacks rather than constructive criticism, attributing motives without substantiation. [-2]