The statement is a response to a conversation about the perceived failure of GPT-4.5, a product of OpenAI. It reflects a tone of vindication and suggests that the outcome was predictable to the speaker, contrasting with the surprise expressed by others. The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses a public issue related to the performance and reception of a widely used AI product.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it adopts a tone of 'I told you so,' which can be seen as dismissive and not conducive to productive discussion. It does not directly attack individuals but implies a sense of superiority over those who disagreed.
[-1]