Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement involves public figures discussing international relations and political conduct, which are substantive public issues. The tone is critical and confrontational, focusing on perceived disrespect and political actions by Zelenskyy. It reflects concerns about diplomatic etiquette and geopolitical tensions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a confrontational tone that could escalate tensions, slightly violating the principle. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but questions the dignity of a public figure, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue, violating the principle. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack, violating the principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or constructive, slightly violating the principle. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.