-3
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
Mark Scott
@onedarwinian
·
328d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
332d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the serious issue of nuclear war and international diplomacy. It expresses a strong opinion about the involvement of individuals in geopolitical matters, questioning their stake in the situation.
- The statement uses accusatory language, which could be seen as harmful, reducing its alignment with the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the personal stake of an individual in a global issue, potentially infringing on privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses a confrontational tone, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.