Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement addresses a public issue involving the FBI, the President, and the legality of certain actions, which constitutes public discourse. The tone suggests a critical stance towards the FBI's actions, implying they were 'unlawful and illegal.'
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('unlawful and illegal') that could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the actions of a public institution.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory in nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a strong accusation without providing evidence or engaging in discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory nature without evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.