Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -109
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
329d
Healthy relationships depend on mutual respect. Ukraine and Europe don't respect us; they look down on us. America never had any obligation to protect Ukraine. And now we're asking why we should continue to spend our money, and put our lives on the line, to protect Europe.
2/28/2025, 11:42:17 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
329d
@EmmanuelMacron @AVindman Great. Go protect Ukraine. While you’re at it, protect the rest of Europe. You don’t respect the American people. You say you do but you don’t. You’ve made that clear. No healthy relationship can survive such disrespect.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
329d
The behavior of Zelenskyy is typical of Europe as a whole. Entitled. In denial of reality. Narcissistic. Unconcerned with our need to deal with many massive internal problems. Such juvenile & entitled behavior makes us less not more desirous of helping Ukraine and Europe.
Emmanuel Macron
@EmmanuelMacron
·
329d
There is an aggressor: Russia.

There is a victim: Ukraine.

We were right to help Ukraine and sanction Russia three years ago—and to keep doing so.

By “we,” I mean the Americans, the Europeans, the Canadians, the Japanese, and many others.

Thank you to…

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing international relations and the dynamics between Europe, Ukraine, and the U.S. It uses a confrontational tone, suggesting a lack of understanding and respect among European leaders and Ukraine. The use of 'FAFO' (an acronym for 'F*** Around and Find Out') implies a threat or warning, which can be seen as aggressive and dismissive.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement's confrontational tone and use of 'FAFO' could be seen as harmful, reducing the potential for constructive dialogue. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals involved, using dismissive language. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering division. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for a personal attack instead. [-2]