Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -109

The statement criticizes a public figure for prioritizing foreign interests over domestic ones, reflecting a nationalistic perspective. It engages in public discourse by addressing foreign policy and representation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as harmful by implying disloyalty, which may not promote constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of the person it addresses, as it uses a shaming tactic. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in a personal attack. [-1]