Michael Schellenberger

The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing international relations, specifically the dynamics between the US, Europe, and Ukraine. The tone is critical and suggests a breakdown in relationships due to perceived disrespect and entitlement.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement may cause harm by generalizing and attributing negative traits to entire groups, potentially fostering division. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not respect the dignity of Europeans or Ukrainians, as it makes broad, negative generalizations. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against Europeans and Ukrainians, rather than constructive criticism. [-2]