Michael Schellenberger

Rank 42 of 47

Score -109

People say The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances in 1994 provided security assurances, but it did not include a binding defense commitment. Even pro-war voices admit the US is not legally obligated to defend Ukraine militarily under the Budapest Memorandum.

3/1/2025, 1:07:13 PM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

330d

Zelenskyy says he’s grateful for US support but he acts entitled to it. He still hasn’t apologized for his behavior. And now he’s demanding the US do more. Zelensky, like Europe, doesn’t respect us. And relationships without mutual respect can’t last.

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

330d

Healthy relationships depend on mutual respect. Ukraine and Europe don't respect us; they look down on us. America never had any obligation to protect Ukraine. And now we're asking why we should continue to spend our money, and put our lives on the line, to protect Europe.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the legal and diplomatic implications of the Budapest Memorandum and the U.S.'s role in Ukraine's security. It presents a factual analysis of the memorandum's limitations and the U.S.'s obligations, or lack thereof, to Ukraine. The statement is neutral and factual, focusing on the legal aspects rather than emotional or personal arguments.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does no harm and is fact-based, providing a clear analysis of the Budapest Memorandum. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding by clarifying the legal context of the U.S.'s obligations under the memorandum. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement avoids personal attacks and focuses on constructive analysis of international agreements. [+1]