Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -109
3/1/2025, 1:30:14 PM
X
In reply to:
Matthew Yglesias
@mattyglesias
·
330d
Most congressional Republicans, especially in the senate, did not agree with Trump’s pro-Russian foreign policy so he (and especially Vance) staged a little blow-up in the Oval Office to give them a pretext to flip-flop and here we are.
Andrew Desiderio
@AndrewDesiderio
·
330d
It appears that @SenatorWicker has deleted this tweet highlighting his meeting with Zelensky & a bipartisan group of senators this morning.

The statement questions the validity of a conspiracy theory mentioned in a previous tweet, asking for evidence. It engages in public discourse by addressing political actions and foreign policy decisions involving U.S. senators and former President Trump.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and seeks clarification, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By asking for evidence, the statement promotes understanding and critical thinking, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the basis of a claim without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]