Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47

Score -113

-4

The increase in California’s violent crime rate to 31% higher than the US as a whole generated so much negative publicity that state lawmakers hope to pass legislation that would criminalize self-defense by homeowners during a home invasion. Gavin Newsom would likely to sign it.

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

334d

You cut fire prevention; LA burned. You spent $24 billion on homelessness; it rose 40%. You reduced penalties for violent crime; it's 31% higher in California than in the US as a whole. And instead of taking responsibility, you're trying to become an influencer. It's pathetic.

3/1/2025, 5:23:15 PM

The statement discusses a proposed bill in California that could impact homeowners' rights to self-defense, linking it to broader issues of crime and governance. It implies criticism of state leadership, particularly Gavin Newsom, suggesting a failure to address crime effectively. The tone is critical and accusatory.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement may cause harm by spreading fear or misinformation about self-defense rights. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It does not respect the dignity of lawmakers by implying malicious intent without evidence. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]