Reposted by Christopher C. Cuomo
Jordan Schachtel
@JordanSchachtel
·
272d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a political issue involving public figures and their interactions. It challenges a narrative about a meeting between Zelensky and Trump, suggesting a different perspective on the events.
- The statement attempts to clarify a narrative, which can contribute to understanding, but it may also perpetuate division if not handled carefully.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it challenges another's viewpoint, which could be seen as confrontational.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By providing context about Zelensky's mindset, the statement aims to promote understanding, though it may not fully succeed if it polarizes the audience. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by offering a different perspective, but it could be more effective if it avoided potential personal attacks or implications.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.