Reposted by Christopher C. Cuomo
The statement presents a hypothetical scenario where a foreign adversary would support certain policies that could weaken the United States. It engages with public issues related to national security, international relations, and public health, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm with words and actions, but it implies potential harm by suggesting policies that could weaken national security and public health. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It presents a hypothetical scenario that could incite fear or division. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It presents a one-sided view without inviting discussion or alternative perspectives. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society. It suggests policies that could be detrimental to national and global stability. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by presenting a controversial opinion, but it lacks responsibility and integrity by not considering the potential negative impacts of the suggested policies. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.