In reply to:
David Pfau
@pfau
·
134d
juliette pluto
@foundjuliette
·
134d
The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a discussion about the accuracy of predictions related to economic recessions, which is a public issue. The tone of the statement is accusatory and dismissive, particularly towards @pfau, while expressing support for @foundjuliette.
- The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words, as it includes a personal attack on @pfau's integrity. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of @pfau by accusing them of lacking integrity, which could be considered a form of harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, opting instead for a personal attack on @pfau. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.