Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
134d
Some examples where I anticipated exactly what @pfau said, over the last several years:
March, 2022: https://nautil.us/deep-learning-…
May, 2022: https://garymarcus.substack.com/…
April, 2023: https://garymarcus.substack.com/…
April 2024: https://garymarcus.substack.com/…
Feb 2025: https://garymarcus.substack.com/…
3/1/2025, 10:53:28 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
134d
@pfau @foundjuliette JFC Pfau, this is exactly what i predicted and i didn’t get anything wrong.

@foundjuliette has integrity. You do not.
David Pfau
@pfau
·
135d
@foundjuliette @GaryMarcus "This economist accurately predicted 9 out of the last 2 recessions"
juliette pluto
@foundjuliette
·
135d
@pfau yup. in hindsight, @GaryMarcus called it with remarkable accuracy.

The statement is part of a public discourse involving a debate on the accuracy of predictions related to artificial intelligence and the integrity of the individuals involved. The tone is defensive and accusatory, focusing on personal consistency and honesty.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but contributes to a hostile tone in the discourse, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement accuses another of dishonesty, which could be seen as a form of personal attack, potentially violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather focuses on defending one's own position and attacking another's integrity. [-2]