In reply to:
Cadessbor
@Cadessbor
·
206d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
206d
The statement by @Cadessbor engages in a discussion about political figures and authoritarianism, which is a public issue. The tone is defensive and aims to clarify the intent of the previous statement by emphasizing truth-telling and understanding authoritarianism through historical context.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of the previous commenter's perspective, which might indirectly contribute to a polarized discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by encouraging reading and learning about authoritarian figures, which aligns with promoting empathy and compassion through knowledge. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks, focusing on the content of the discussion rather than attacking the individual. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.